You gotta
love Canada! Looks like some artists up there have been getting plenty
stirred up over the embarrassing stance taken by CRIA (pronounced "kreea" - yeah
right) and the universally despised RIAA. They are forming a group of content
creators with some very impressive credentials, that are going to make darn
sure that politicians get to hear more than just one side of the story. This is
great that the people that make the content are able to band together and try to
force change on society. It is time that corporations caught up with the
consumer. Down with DRM!
Check out the present list of CMCC
Members:
Barenaked Ladies, Avril Lavigne, Sarah McLachlan, Chantal Kreviazuk,
Sum 41, Stars, Raine Maida (Our Lady Peace), Dave Bidini (Rheostatics), Billy
Talent, John K. Samson (Weakerthans), Broken Social Scene, Sloan, Andrew Cash
and Bob Wiseman (Co-founder Blue Rodeo).
A NEW
VOICE
We are a growing coalition of Canadian
music creators who share the common goal of having our voices heard about
the laws and policies that affect our livelihoods. We are the people who
actually create Canadian music. Without us, there would be no music for
copyright laws to protect.
Until now, a group of multinational record
labels has done most of the talking about what Canadian artists need out
of copyright. Record companies and music publishers are not our enemies,
but let's be clear: lobbyists for major labels are looking out for their
shareholders, and seldom speak for Canadian artists. Legislative proposals
that would facilitate lawsuits against our fans or increase the labels'
control over the enjoyment of music are made not in our
names, but on behalf of the labels' foreign parent companies.
It is the government's responsibility to
protect Canadian artists from exploitation. This requires a firm
commitment to programs that support Canadian music talent, and a fresh
approach to copyright law reform. Canadian music creators have identified
three principles that should guide the copyright reform process.
1. Suing Our Fans is Destructive
and Hypocritical Artists do not want to sue music fans. The
labels have been suing our fans against our will, and laws enabling these
suits cannot be justified in our names. We oppose any copyright reforms
that would make it easier for record companies to do this. The government
should repeal provisions of the Copyright Act that allow labels to
unfairly punish fans who share music for non-commercial purposes with
statutory damages of $500 to $20,000 per song.
2. Digital Locks are Risky and
Counterproductive Artists do not support using digital locks
to increase the labels' control over the distribution, use and enjoyment
of music or laws that prohibit circumvention of such technological
measures. The government should not blindly implement decade-old treaties
designed to give control to major labels and take choices away from
artists and consumers. Laws should protect artists and consumers, not
restrictive technologies. Consumers should be able to transfer the music
they buy to other formats under a right of fair use, without having to pay
twice.
3. Cultural Policy Should Support
Actual Canadian Artists The vast majority of new Canadian
music is not promoted by major labels, which focus mostly on foreign
artists. The government should use other policy tools to support actual
Canadian artists and a thriving musical and cultural scene. The government
should make a long-term commitment to grow support mechanisms like the
Canada Music Fund and FACTOR, invest in music training and education,
create limited tax shelters for copyright royalties, protect artists from
inequalities in bargaining power and make collecting societies more
transparent. |
Good, throw the rascals out! Those of you out there that
would like to monitor this movement, can do so by visiting this page for the Canadian Music Creators
Coalition. (It is also available in a French version) Thank goodness, at
least there is a voice out there that is not afraid to buck the system.
I've often wondered when reading how the labels rip off the musicians, by
withholding royalties or claiming that advertising, distribution, promotions
etc., leaves little money left for the artist, why is there the need
for such an infrastructure. Surely, the importance of a label has come and
gone with todays technologies. Maybe this movement will mark the beginning
of the end.
Source: Canadian Music Creators Coalition