This is an update to the former case reported here. This article is an interesting read, if only to spot the abbreviation The Register uses for 'Association,' one that should become the 'standard' for the organization due to its so-called 'legal approach.' Here is the result of this failed
attempt:
Given the fact the RIAA did not proclaim any kind of settlement, it is doubtful any money settlement occurred, as the organization vocalizes any kind of 'victory' it obtains. Also, when a judge has appeared somewhat informed about the true character of the RIAA and its strong-arm tactics, as well as being willing to really look for the facts of the case on the defendant's behalf, the RIAA has backed down each time. An interesting addendum to this case is how Wilke is completely off the hook, and this 'avenue' is one the RIAA can no longer travel with this man, due to the 'with prejudice' stipulation (see link for definition, one not unlike the concept of 'double jeopardy,' although the latter implies a sense of guilt, whereas the former only implies the permanent closure).
Aside from the blog in question (see main article link), it would be interesting to see more of these failed attempts compiled, so future defendants could readily refer to them, using them to poke holes or generate reasonable doubt about the questionable nature of the RIAA's motions in these affairs.Source: The Register
