Tune swappers scoff at RIAA lawsuits


StrongBad used our news
submit
to tell us about a story that
relates the attitude of some defiant file-sharers out there. The article states
that if the countless file- sharers trolling through cyberspace
were intimidated by the spate of lawsuits, you wouldn't know it. Even though as
we have read, 261 folks lives
are about to be impacted by the U.S. legal system. The other 59 million or so
are not taking it seriously. The consensus message from a bounty of cavalier
posts aimed at the Recording Industry Association of America became abundantly
clear: Bring it on!

Here are a few of their bold
remarks of disobedience and contempt directed at the RIAA, it's legal
drive and the music industry in general.

Nanuk,
for example, heartily pounded his chest along with his cronies
on Yahoo "You can take away my MP3's when you pry my mouse out of my
cold dead hands."

It's all about the money, according to Tnintbubse: "Consumers will not tolerate their price gouging and they need to come up with something else besides suing college kids. The industry has gone unchecked too long and has passed the cost down to us. Now they are crying."

Howler24
drew a line of futility between what he feels are two ill-fated crusades:
"Yes, you can cry and moan about the 'evils' of drugs and file sharing.
But when you're through foaming at the mouth, you have to realize that
they are BOTH here to stay. No law, no court can change that. The best
thing to do is to control it and make it profitable, instead of driving it
underground."

From Rmonster: "I have a feeling that anyone who signs up for this 'amnesty' is going to find themselves up the creek. Sending a notarized copy of your ID and statement that you did, in fact, break the law (in their eyes at least) does not sound like amnesty, but suicide."

As Apophis sees it, the RIAA is out of touch "It's time for the RIAA as we know it to go away and an agency more in tune with the 21st century needs to be put in its place. One that looks forward and not stuck in decades old business practices."

Though greatly outnumbered, some did play devil's advocate --AndyCane, for instance, didn't see much wiggle room for the virtual apologists: "I'm no huge fan of the RIAA, but they have a right to protect their copyrighted material and (neither) you, nor I, nor anyone else, has the right to 'share' it without paying for it, at least not on the scale that it's done on file-sharing sites."

Then, of course, there was plenty of cheeky advice. This morsel from SkyPilotTB: "Stop book sharing. Sue libraries."

And WWWFairfield hinted at hopping aboard the Justin and Britney bashing bandwagon with his take: "Look at the top ten -- THAT explains why sales of CDs are lacking. Stop looking for pretty faces and recruit real musicians to record and sell music."

Let's just hope
Nanuck was pounding out those remarks on a laptop down at the
local Starbucks drinking a Latte. Precious anonymity is being stripped
away on the Net.

Source: netscape5.marketwatch.com

No posts to display